Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Building Physics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Becker, R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Air Leakage of Curtain Walls – Diagnostics and Remediation

R Becker*

National Building Research Institute, Haifa, Israel

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: becker{at}tx.technion.ac.il.


   Abstract

This article demonstrates how monitoring of construction during a laboratory mock-up test was used to diagnose proneness to air leakage and to devise improved details. The curtain wall was built on a moveable, rigid frame that simulates the load-bearing structure. Construction details and components were identical to those used in actual buildings. The frame brings the curtain wall into contact with the test box, ensuring that the walls structural supports are not affected. Construction activities were monitored while the measurements included air flow rate versus air pressure difference across the wall, and horizontal deflections of wall mullions and beams. Locations of leakage points were detected using white smoke. The wall showed a density of air flow rate of 1.5 m3m-2h-1 at a pressure difference of ~300 Pa, barely meeting the requirements for EN 12152 classification level A2. Correlating leakage points with detected construction weaknesses led to remedial actions by the manufacturer. The tests were repeated, revealing an improved air-tightness (density of air flow rate less than 0.6 m3m-2h-1 at 350 Pa, and 0.8 m3m-2h-1 when extrapolated to 600 Pa), which meets the requirements for classification level E.

First published on November 5, 2009
Journal of Building Physics 2009, doi:10.1177/1744259109349665


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?